(no subject)

[unij]

Which do you guys think is worse:

To live your entire life in unhappiness, or to live the first part of your life in relative happiness, only to have it all suddenly stripped away and the rest of it be unhappy?

Comments

nor this one

[inspirethefire.livejournal.com]

One thing that comes to mind to me is the reverse situation: people did a study, asking if people would prefer to live a very unhappy life all the way through, or if they wanted to live another three years at the end of their life that was slightly less unhappy. It still wouldn't be pleasant, and it would be prolonging things... but the overwhelming majority of people still said that they would prefer that.

[historycodebook]

Hmmm.... I don't know about that study. It's interesting for sure, but it doesn't seem like a complete reversal of the question. In the study, I get the feeling that death plays a stronger role in the decision while in your question, it felt more like the focus was on quality or fulfillment of life... if that makes sense. It might be just me.

Also, what does that study suggest as an answer to this question? Does it side on unhappy for one's whole life being worse since more people would rather live three more years even if they were unhappy?

[universejuice.livejournal.com]

Well, we learned about that in my High School Psychology class as a matter of peoples' preference to easing the way out of pain rather than simply cutting it off. Like, how a lot of people had a better opinion of a painful dental treatment if the process was longer, but the pain was slowly decreased instead of just ending. I never read the actual study, I just heard about it in that class and it came to mind in regards to the question.

[historycodebook]

Woah, you had a psychology class in high school? Mine had nothing like that. And I'm the opposite on that dental thing. Yikes. ._.